top of page

References

  • All academic articles referenced in this controversy atlas: 

​

​

​

​

​

​

 

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

  • Van Staaveren, N., Decina, C., Baes, C. F., Widowski, T. M., Berke, O., & Harlander-Matauschek, A. (2018). A Description of Laying Hen Husbandry and Management Practices in Canada. Animals, 8(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/ani8070114 

​

  • Bejaei, M., Wiseman, K., & Cheng, K. M. (2015). Developing logistic regression models using purchase attributes and demographics to predict the probability of purchases of regular and specialty eggs. British Poultry Science, 56(4), 425–435. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071668.2015.1058917 

​

​

​

  • Nolan, H. R. J., Hemsworth, L. M., Power-Geary, J. A., & Taylor, P. S. (2022). A Cage Is a Cage, Unless You Educate. Rhetoric Negatively Impacts Support for a Novel Housing System for Laying Hens Unless the Public Are Educated. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2022.797911 

​

  • Rohlf, V. I., Howell, T. J., Coleman, G., & Rault, J.-L. (2019). Engagement through online discussion: Perceptions of laying hen welfare in furnished cages. Animal, 13(9), 1999–2006. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731118003427 

​

  • Sir James Dunn Animal Welfare Centre – Atlantic Veterinary College | UPEI. (n.d.). Retrieved March 16, 2026, from https://awc.upei.ca/ 

​

  • Weary, D. M., Ventura, B. A., & von Keyserlingk, M. A. G. (2016). Societal views and animal welfare science: Understanding why the modified cage may fail and other stories. Animal, 10(2), 309–317. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731115001160 

  • Doyon, M., Bergeron, S., Cranfield, J., Tamini, L., & Criner, G. (2016). Consumer Preferences for Improved Hen Housing: Is a Cage a Cage? Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue Canadienne d’agroeconomie, 64(4), 739–751. https://doi.org/10.1111/cjag.12113 â€‹

​

​

​​

​

  • Nolan, H. R. J., Hemsworth, L. M., Power-Geary, J. A., & Taylor, P. S. (2022). A Cage Is a Cage, Unless You Educate. Rhetoric Negatively Impacts Support for a Novel Housing System for Laying Hens Unless the Public Are Educated. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2022.797911 

​​

  • Ochs, D. S., Wolf, C. A., Widmar, N. J. O., & Bir, C. (2018). Consumer perceptions of egg-laying hen housing systems. Poultry Science, 97(10), 3390–3396. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pey205 

​​

​​

  • Pelletier, N., Doyon, M., Muirhead, B., Widowski, T., Nurse-Gupta, J., & Hunniford, M. (2018). Sustainability in the Canadian Egg Industry—Learning from the Past, Navigating the Present, Planning for the Future. Sustainability, 10(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/su10103524 

​​

  • Rahmani, D., Kallas, Z., Pappa, M., & Gil, J. M. (2019). Are Consumers’ Egg Preferences Influenced by Animal-Welfare Conditions and Environmental Impacts? Sustainability, 11(22). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11226218

​

  • Rohlf, V. I., Howell, T. J., Coleman, G., & Rault, J.-L. (2019). Engagement through online discussion: Perceptions of laying hen welfare in furnished cages. Animal, 13(9), 1999–2006. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731118003427

​

  • Rondoni, A., Asioli, D., & Millan, E. (2020). Consumer behaviour, perceptions, and preferences towards eggs: A review of the literature and discussion of industry implications. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 106, 391–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2020.10.038 

​​

  • Scrinis, G., Parker, C., & Carey, R. (2017). The Caged Chicken or the Free-Range Egg? The Regulatory and Market Dynamics of Layer-Hen Welfare in the UK, Australia and the USA. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 30(6), 783–808. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-017-9699-y 

​

  • ​Sonntag, W. I., Spiller, A., & von Meyer-Höfer, M. (2019). Discussing modern poultry farming systems—Insights into citizen’s lay theories. Poultry Science, 98(1), 209–216. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pey292 

​​

​​

  • Weary, D. M., Ventura, B. A., & von Keyserlingk, M. A. G. (2016). Societal views and animal welfare science: Understanding why the modified cage may fail and other stories. Animal, 10(2), 309–317. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731115001160 â€‹â€‹â€‹

bottom of page